and that's all caps, baby.
Published on September 5, 2005 By Spc Nobody Special In Current Events
Over the last few days, I've grown tired of seeing comments like this float up like the fecal matter they are, over and over again, by people desperately looking for a scapegoat to hang the blame on.

"That was a BS post, US help was so slow, so slow to act compaired to the actions that where taken for the victums of the tsunami over sea's. "

HELLO! Aid is coming, and has been arriving as much as is possible for an impossible situation. But there's not a rescue or aid worker in the world that enjoys being cussed out, shot at, abused in the media, and blamed for the foolish choices of many, they're out there laying it on the line to help a lot of people that made bad, bad choices, starting with where they live, and continuing with staying put for the storm.

Furthermore where are people getting the idea that tsunami aid was so quick in getting to Indonesia and the other nations surrounding the Indian Ocean. May I quote my good friend the wikipedia? I'll look up the news sources too if ya like, but it's a decent source to start with.

"On 3 January, UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan urged the donor nations to ensure that their pledges will be fully honoured, pointing to previous cases where "we got lots of pledges, but we did not receive all the money."

Hmmm about one week later, how 'bout 3 months?

"In mid-March, the Asian Development Bank reported that over USD 4 billion in aid promised by government was behind schedule. Sri Lanka criticised the nations and organisations that clamoured to pledge donations, “Not a penny had come through yet."

If you like this, start looking at the material goods, you'll see teams sent, planes sent, blankets, teddy bears, rice. Everybody sent something, even Kim Jong Il. But when did they start going? Middle of January, beginning of February. One week after, two weeks after, six weeks after. The big stuff didn't start arriving for a week at least, and mostly two or three weeks later.

New Orleans got what was around as soon as the storm lifted enough to send people end. Big help started arriving in less than two days. It's a week now, and FEMA's there, the Army's there, the Coast Guard's there, the National Guard's there. Shit. In a few days I'll be there to help my sister, and if I can find a place to help, I might stick around for a few days.

Moreover, communities in all the surrounding states have opened their arms to take in refugees. How long was it before Texas promised the AstroDome to the refugees? I live in a tiny city in central Texas near Killeen, and I know of at least 600 refugees are being taken care of by the community as of two days ago. People are opening their homes and their churches to strangers.

Aid arrived fast, and more is arriving every day. Contrary to what I've been seeing time and again, as far as speed goes, the tsunami aid had absolutely nothing on the aid that arrived and continues to arrive in New Orleans.

For crying out loud, stop looking for people to blame, and start looking for ways to help."

Comments
on Sep 05, 2005

You mean there's no 'instant aid' packet that you can just add hot water to and stir?  I'm disappointed.

Seriously, I agree wholeheartedly.  It takes TIME for people to get there, it takes TIME for supplies to get rounded up and shipped down there, it takes TIME for people to get a plan of action together and to put said plan into effect.  it all takes TIME....and people screaming for help after 24 hours doesn't help matters any.

on Sep 05, 2005
True, there is no "instant aid" and the state cannot impose aid on the county or city anymore than the federal government can.

But from my assessment of the response, it is running around 24 hours behind the standard... Not because the aid wasn't available, but the Mayor and Governor apparently thought that all they had to do was make a few declarations and the federal government would take care of everything. Instand Aid doesn't even exist once the disaster is declared.
on Sep 06, 2005
Aren't we told to have 3 to 5 day ( should be 5 to7 days ) disaster kit in our home for this type of thing. Because it takes time to get aid going. This is not Star Trek , it can't be beamed in!
on Sep 06, 2005

Aren't we told to have 3 to 5 day ( should be 5 to7 days ) disaster kit in our home for this type of thing

That's exactly why we have one.  We've had one since the Y2K scare, and this hurricane has just enhanced our awareness of the need to have one.

I can't say that "we're prepared' because I don't believe anyone is ever fully prepared for disaster.  However, we're better equipped than most folks.

I only hope we never have to use our kit.  Ever.

on Sep 06, 2005

For crying out loud, stop looking for people to blame, and start looking for ways to help."

During most crisies, the blame game waits for the disaster to be mitigated (9-11).  This started from day one.  We can only assume that the left wants to politicize anything against Bush due to their shere hatred of him.  The most laughable aspect is that they now argue that it is Bush's fault due to his not signing the Kyoto Protocols.

on Sep 08, 2005
MS and LA gaurdsmen and their equipment were pulled away from the path of the storm damage to staging areas, where they and the equipment which would be needed would be ready when the time came to return.

Now for some questions:

Where should the National Gaurdsmen have been sent first?
Along what roads?
With what skill sets, 11B's, 35M's, 71D's, 90B's ?
What are the conditions of the roads and the terrain you wish to use for transport?
Are any bridges out or damaged?
If so, can this be determined beforehand, or only on first inspection, causing a re-route and turnaround?
What sort of trucks or vehicles should be used?
Helicopters?
What kinds?
Carrying what kinds of supplies or personnel?
Where are the fuel staging areas for refueling these vechiles?
Are the resources quickly available to re-supply the fuel staging areas?
How long can given personnel remain working before relief is needed?
Where is the relief coming from?
Where are they now?
What impact will an interruption have on rescue efforts?
Might less critical work have to be halted due to short term personnel absences?
Might someone die because of this?
What will the overall rescue strategy be--like an Easter Egg hunt?
Pick up the first person you see or is there a better solutoin?
Should operations be grid factored?
Can both be done simutaneously?
If so, to what levels of committment, 40% each? 60/90?

Plan then execute

Civilians need to plan on surviving a minimum of 5 days before relief is expected.


It is very easy to persume the answer when the wrong question is asked.
Move away from abstract quarterbacking a bit, and the sheer physical magnitude of the problems to be delt with comes a bit more into focus.
A wise man will admit ignorance and stand down from criticism.
on Sep 08, 2005

Where should the National Gaurdsmen have been sent first?

Who had the authority to send them first as well?

on Sep 08, 2005
Secret Squirrel:

All of those questions are legitimate, and if the "New Orleans Comprehensive Emergency Plan" had have been "comprehensive", those concerns would have been addressed long before there ever was a "hurricane Katrina"...

Like in Mississippi and Alabama.